Showing posts with label tv series. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tv series. Show all posts

Friday, 26 February 2021

It's a Sin - Television Series Review

It’s a Sin is a television master class from Russell T Davies.

Telling the story of a group of five friends who decide to share a flat in London in the early ’80s, and tracking their path as HIV and AIDS ravage their social group, we get to see the joy and exuberance of youth, with all their potential reaching out ahead of them, only to then see those lives crash into the horror of a pandemic that spares no one it touches.

Given a new perspective with the COVID-19 pandemic, it is hard not to empathise with these young lives as half are dashed and lost to the pandemic, leaving the survivors racked with guilt and pain about moving on without their friends.

There are so many pitfalls that could have tempted Davies to run off course, as his narrative is fraught with all the negatives that ran alongside the HIV/AIDS pandemic that would still risk alienating mainstream viewers. These negatives are born out of homophobia and ignorance, and general disdain from the mainstream public to people who are different.

It's a Sin bubbles with joy and the celebration of life. It touches on almost every relevant aspect during those tumultuous times, but Davies shows his immeasurable talent to avoid getting on a soapbox and preaching. He allows these aspects to run alongside the story without ever intruding on his narrative.

Beautifully cast with Olly Alexander as Richie Tozer, the character, who along with Jill played by, Lydia West, forms the heart of the group who all come together to live in the pink palace. This London apartment houses an eclectic group of five: Ritchie, Jill, Ash (Nathaniel Curtis), Roscoe (Omari Douglas) and Colin (Callum Scott Howells).

Colin’s story delivers one of the emotional high points of the show. His innocence, shy and slightly naïve character, with only one sexual partner behind him and designs on a very humble life, is one of the first to succumb to a disease that didn’t discriminate based on sexual promiscuity. 

It is hard not to break down in tears when he delivers some of the most emotional lines of the entire series, as he tries to make sense of what is happening to him. It is Davies way of saying this disease was unfair, that it didn’t seek out those who were sexually promiscuous, that it could touch everyone no matter what their situation or sexual history. Davies also deftly makes the point that sexual exploration and enjoyment is a natural part of young lives and shouldn’t be stigmatised or avoided, despite what the ‘just say no’ and ‘stay celibate’ brigade tend to promote.

There are dozens of moments where Davies manages to get these sorts of messages across in anything but a heavy-handed way, and never with any other effect than to strengthen his visual storytelling. He briefly highlights issues that could themselves be a central story narrative for a movie or miniseries, and often the impact of these moments are immense while their screen time is fleeting. The mother of a young boy who we only see a glimpse of early in the series, comes angrily into the hospital to confront those in charge of the HIV ward to find out how and why they would think her rugged, manly son could be mixed in with those struck down by this gay disease? There is no other comment made by Davies than to allow this moment to resonate and make its point clearly without it ever being laboured. This entire story of a devasted mother and her son's unwilling outing is visually told and ended in a twenty-second sequence that smacks you right between your eyes.

He does the same with the terror and confusion in the early years of the disease, regarding the information available on how the disease is caught and transmitted. Showering and scrubbing the skin after Jill tends for the first of her immediate friends to fall ill, and that friend’s desperation to keep his news secret from his other friends. Clothes are burnt, and possessions thrown into bonfires rather than touched by those who love the victims struck down by the disease.

At one point, with Jill caring for Greg, an older member of their group and played perfectly by David Carlyle, she’s surprised when her friends show up with him at their apartment, and Greg announces he’s feeling better. Jill watches him drink from one of the apartments coffee mugs. We then see Jill scrub the mug twice; then, she decides to put the mug at the very back of the cup cupboard. As she tries to sleep, the paranoia over that cup keeps her awake, and she gets up to throw it in the bin rather than let any of her friends drink from it. Still unable to sleep, she gets up a second time, takes that cup from the bin and smashes it into pieces. It’s a beautiful visual representation of just how paranoid and terrified everyone was about the disease in those early years when the uncertainty and confusion reigned around how it was caught.

There’s a great deal made in the press about the use of gay actors to play gay roles. I find this counter-productive but until openly gay actors start getting cast in straight roles on the strength of their ability and not overlooked because of their sexuality and a belief an audience won’t accept them in a straight role, I’m willing to overlook them this redress.

Amari Douglas has the most fun camping it up, but it’s in the scenes with his African family, with traditional customs and superstitions that he comes into his own. It’s an extraordinary storyline that sees his father go from a homophobic evangelist to a man who recognises his son’s safety and happiness must be his primary concern. It’s a story of a second-generation immigrant and only enriches the front and centre drama, as Roscoe moves into the Pink Palace.

Equally noteworthy are Stephen Fry and Neil Patrick Harris, Fry as the politician with his ‘boy’, and a fantastic lunch scene with several other conservative politicians, all with their boys silent but sneering at each other across a lunch table at a cloistered club.

Harris warms up in his role as a stuffy English retail assistant in a Saville Row bespoke tailoring shop. His initial appearance comes across more a caricature of the older style English gentleman than a three-dimensional character addicted to manners and protocol. As he lets down his guard and mentors young Colin into gay life in London, we understand his mask is one he’s worn for a lifetime while living his real-life behind closed doors and safe-space venues with his partner of thirty years. When the first wave of the disease hits this couple’s closeted lives, we get yet another immense moment hidden by its brevity. The long-time companions are separated to die apart as families with more rights to their relative than a legally unrecognised partnership of thirty years, move to care for their loved one. These two men in their fifties die alone, separated, with neither understanding what has befallen them, mistakenly blaming domestic decisions with detergents or mold, and marvelling at the tragedy of both being hit with terminal diseases that seem random and unrelated. This story of separation due to a lack of legal standing has played out untold times across the ages of gay history, although it became particularly cruel during the AIDS pandemic.

Activists are trying to warn young gay revellers who dismiss their warnings of a gay disease as ludicrous and some sort of grand conspiratorial rumour started by the gay-hating conservative elements. As news of disease, largely cancer or other serious illness, seeks out and targets gay men, Ritchie Tozer loudly decries, “I don’t believe it because I’m not stupid.” It did sound stupid in those early years, these random, terminal illnesses befalling mostly gay men. Rumours swirled about poppers (Amyl Nitrate), being a cause, about a link to gay saunas, you could catch it off surfaces, it was born in a lab to target the gay population and on and on it went in an eerily similar rumour file to today’s pandemic.

The bravest member of the cast is possibly Nathaniel Hall, who has done much to dispel the stigma of those living with HIV through his one-man show, “First Time”. His show details how he caught HIV from his first sexual experience at sixteen and will hopefully be streaming sometime soon. 

Cast as Ritchie’s boyfriend, Donald Bassett, one of the many young men who silently disappeared to their parents, never to be seen again, his inclusion in the cast is more than a nice touch; it’s an important statement. HIV is now managed by 29 million people worldwide, and almost fifty per cent of these are heterosexual. Most manage their condition so well they have an undetectable viral load with no chance of transmission. Hall holds his own alongside the extraordinarily multi-talented Olly Alexander. 

There is so much to love and to cry about in watching It’s a Sin. Every cast and crew member can be rightly proud for playing their part in bringing such a series to life. It is a story that needs telling. Russel T Davies has taken forty years to gain enough composure to make sense of his experiences and find a story that entertains above all else. He has managed to include all aspects of a horrific world event that didn’t spare any demographic but tended to concentrate on some more than others. 

Be brave enough to watch, but don’t do it lightly. You will need time to think and gather yourself for this one, possibly with a pause or two between episodes. You cannot help but be deeply affected, but if, like myself, you were alive and out during those times, you may be affected more than others. It’s a Sin is so well rendered; I found scenes I lived and words I heard spoken that I put to rest many years ago, only for them to jump out and grab me like I was reliving those moments again. 

It’s a Sin is the best of premier television and will likely be a favourite tear-jerker to be streamed and discovered for years to come. 

5 pink stars for this one.     

Russel T Davies gives a fantastic interview in the Guardian about his experiences during the eighties and nineties, coming out and living beside HIV/AIDS. 

There is so much in this interview that I recognise in my own story. It makes sense that I would relate so strongly to It’s a Sin. I'm aware this relationship to the material may have made the series feel more impactful to me than it will prove for others.



Wednesday, 13 February 2013

The LA Complex - Review

HUGE LA COMPLEX SPOILERS INCLUDED:

It was a little bit like Melrose but without the drama queenery. It was a lot like other shows that have come and gone about people making it in show business.


The LA Complex began as a thought from Canada with primary locations spread in that country and LA. Six episodes became thirteen. Then the CW came on board to ensure airing in the US. Suddenly Season 2 was booked and away we go - or so it must have seemed.

But sadly the online campaign to find an audience may have dissipated viewers - who turned out in record low numbers to watch as the episodes rolled out. Season three was dropped by the production house and then the network and the show had enough warning to tie up all the lose ends.

It's a shame, because there was a show here. It wasn't made with a huge budget and it didn't sport any big names, but it had heart and soul. The characters were all good and the stories good enough through to excellent - but maybe that's why the Complex fell apart.

Am I being too tough? I don't think so. Look at Friday Night Lights - a show that won several reprieves when it was cut. There is a drama that never settled for anything less than excellent and maybe, just maybe had the complex pushed the weaker stories around for a moment longer or found more in those stories that built strongly and then faded - they may have won enough passionate supporters to start an 'uncancel' movement of their own.

The stories that were excellent were The King - or the gay rapper, Andra Fuller. From the shock of his first affair to the poignant final letter to his father that was posted online for his fans - just good storytelling and really nicely acted on all fronts with special mention to his season one lover - Benjamin Charles Watson.









The sweet love story of Nick and April, Joe Dinicol and Georgina Riley, that blossomed as they captured young lovers perfectly and gave me the first believable 'comics trying to make it on screen' that I've ever thought were real. Again great performances.



Connor Lake, Jonathan Patrick Moore, an actor I wrote many a script for in Australia, who played the actor who had made it in a Grey's Anatomy styled series within the series - who had three stories throughout two seasons and each one dropped off once told. This is, for me, where the show began to wobble. Serial drama tends to drop stories in, complete them and then leave and reset characters to begin the next story - but this isn't life. And the reason the gay rapper worked so well was that the first lover's story impacted the rest of his life.


Connor begins a basket case - an out of nowhere actor cast in the lead of a big budget network series - he has to carry the show and he fears he's not good enough. This theme runs through his whole arc for two seasons which is great - his terrible insecurities as  a result of being abandoned by his mother. It's an interesting story - but after one day of 'getting it right' on set - he goes on a bender and ends up with a 30 stitch gash on the side of his face. No problem for this production - it never even got a mention.

Then he burns down his apartment - a story that does get picked up and used well into season two, but at the time it felt more about giving us a big action cliffhanger than a genuine story and it certainly had few immediate consequences. Well when are there when you burn your house down? Connor then signs to be a publicity 'boyfriend' for a big female star on the wane. In a way he finds pseudo parents and instigates the reunion with the woman's ex - it's a nice story. But it comes to an abrupt end... quick - what do we do with Connor now? Let's have him get sucked into scientology - and call it by a slightly different name so we don't get sued. That in itself is a distracting choice - but to be fair the story wasn't terrible and they avoided a hatchet job on the group - and I can even sniff out that a longer term arc was in play thet Connor's long lost sister - the girl who found him and then enticed him to get involved in the group - wasn't his sister at all - but that's just my hunch. If I'm right, the cancellation derailed those plans.

And finally Connor must avoid arson charges and he gets involved in a low budget indy film shoot with his friends. All these stories were never terrible - just a little fractured as far a Connor was concerned.

Similarly Raquel's arc - a washed up child star? maybe a young twenties star, who was slowly being choked to death and starved of opportunities - but also one of the most frustrating characters in the show. How many times did people tell her she would make a great villain? Call it a bitch, a con woman - any number of names for it and always she fought against - while manipulating, stealing, lying, cheating and in short - being a  great villain. She spent a lot of air time doing anything and everything she could to work - except listen. Maybe that's what the producers were going for - that actor who refuses to accept who they are and who tries to always be the hero or the lead - when being bad and disliked is a better choice. But this didn't seem to be what we were watching - but it would have been soooooo good. An actress desperate to be loved - who must choose work and fame and being hated, or no work, no fame and no longer being noticed. Shame - because they had that setup and the casting perfect.



Other stories worked as well - Abbey as the flighty Hollywood starlet who never quite catches on but had all the talent in the world and should have had her big break. gifted child actor Simon and his sister Beth - who ruins things for him by being overprotective - a great twist on the stage mum and of course, Alecia the gifted dancer who get pulled into porn by circumstance and desperation.

The LA complex had far more going for it than against. Actors, writers, producers and directors can very confidently stick this one on their resume and I am sure, over time, through re-runs and DVD/online sales, more people, like me, will watch both seasons and come away very happily entertained.

Why didn't it attract more support? Ironically - that was also the central theme of the show. In Hollywood, some get lucky and catch on. Others, with every reason to catch on and shine - just don't - and a year or two down the track - a whole new batch of fresh young things come along and steal the spotlight.

Or not...

Out of 10 - a really underrated 7.